Catch the estoppel mismatch
Rung 8 of 10 · Fact-check list
1 · Learn the move · Fact-check list
Estoppels come back in due diligence and everyone skims them — which is how buyers inherit a tenant's phantom renewal option or an offset the seller never mentioned. This is the CAM lesson's fact-check list turned up a notch: the same quote-or-no-verdict rule, now applied ACROSS two documents at once — every term gets MATCH or DISCREPANCY with BOTH documents quoted. The new move is the third category: anything the tenant claims that the lease doesn't show becomes an UNSUPPORTED CLAIM (the lease can't be quoted — it's silent) that always reaches the resolve-before-closing list. And the audit never decides who's right — that's a legal question for counsel.
Red-team this estoppel against the lease abstract: quote both documents for every match or mismatch, tag tenant claims the lease doesn't show as unsupported, and never rule on which document controls. [paste both]
2 · Your turn — you write the prompt
In due diligence on a 6-tenant center, one estoppel claims a five-year renewal option at fixed rent and a $9,300 offset for unreimbursed repairs. Your lease abstract shows neither. Write a prompt that surfaces every mismatch — quoted from both documents — without adjudicating either claim.
Remember: the AI sees only your prompt — not this page. If the situation isn't in your prompt, it doesn't exist.
Optional — these shape the output when you run your prompt below, not your score.