Catch the estoppel mismatch
Lesson 4 of 10 · Tenant rep & deal diligence
1 · Learn the move · Fact-check list
Estoppels come back in due diligence and everyone skims them. Which is how buyers inherit a tenant's phantom renewal option or an offset the seller never mentioned. This is the CAM lesson's fact-check list turned up a notch: the same quote-or-no-verdict rule, now applied ACROSS two documents at once. Every term gets MATCH or DISCREPANCY with BOTH documents quoted. The new move is the third category: anything the tenant claims that the lease doesn't show becomes an UNSUPPORTED CLAIM (the lease can't be quoted. It's silent) that always reaches the resolve-before-closing list. And the audit never decides who's right. That's a legal question for counsel.
Red-team this estoppel against the lease abstract: quote both documents for every match or mismatch, tag tenant claims the lease doesn't show as unsupported, and never rule on which document controls. [paste both]
2 · Your turn. You write the prompt
In due diligence on a 6-tenant center, one estoppel claims a five-year renewal option at fixed rent and a $9,300 offset for unreimbursed repairs. Your lease abstract shows neither. Write a prompt that surfaces every mismatch, quoted from both documents. Without adjudicating either claim.
Remember: the AI sees only your prompt, not this page. If the situation isn't in your prompt, it doesn't exist.
Optional. These shape the output when you run your prompt below, not your score.