Structure the scope of work. Organize the assignment, never the value
Rung 4 of 10 · Recipe pattern
1 · Learn the move · Recipe pattern
Before any value is developed, USPAP asks the appraiser to fix the assignment: intended use, intended user, property rights, effective date, approaches, and any extraordinary or hypothetical conditions. You can organize that scaffold from the engagement letter FACTS. You just never fill in a value or certify the scope. The move is a recipe: a fixed set of assignment-element slots you populate ONLY from the pasted engagement, marking any element the letter doesn't state as UNKNOWN → confirm with client/appraiser. Open by naming what this is: a scope outline for a credentialed appraiser, not an appraisal and not USPAP work product. The appraiser sets scope, develops value, and certifies. You hand back a clean, gap-flagged checklist, nothing more.
Write the scope of work for this industrial appraisal so it's USPAP compliant. [paste engagement letter]
2 · Your turn. You write the prompt
You're an analyst supporting a fee appraiser. The engagement letter says: intended use = financing for First Harbor Bank; property rights = fee simple; effective date = 2026-06-30; subject = a 62,000 SF industrial building at 1400 Depot Rd; approaches expected = cost, sales comparison, and income. The client wants the scope-of-work section structured for the report. NOT a value and NOT a signed scope. Write a prompt that organizes the assignment elements from the letter, flags anything the letter is silent on, and routes development and certification back to the appraiser.
Remember: the AI sees only your prompt, not this page. If the situation isn't in your prompt, it doesn't exist.
Optional. These shape the output when you run your prompt below, not your score.