← LibraryBuilder · B9
Reviewer & QA agents
Build-along · ~12 min at your own keyboard
An agent that just wrote a memo is soaked in its own reasoning, the same bias as humans reviewing their own work. A reviewer subagent with a clean context reads the output cold and catches what the writer literally cannot see. For a memo, point it straight at sourcing: every figure traced, every assumption stated as one, no value language without its basis.
Do this
0/4Share what happened
Paste the reviewer's findings on a real deal summary and which ones were legit.